Not every Maryland workplace dispute belongs in a courtroom. In many situations, the parties have already agreed to resolve disagreements through arbitration, placing the outcome in the hands of a neutral decision-maker rather than a judge or jury.
When employers, employees, executives, HR professionals, in-house counsel, and attorneys need a fair and efficient way to resolve a workplace conflict, selecting the right Maryland employment arbitrator is an important decision.
The arbitrator does more than conduct a hearing. They manage the proceedings, address procedural issues, evaluate evidence, and ultimately issue a final award resolving the dispute.
At Smithey Law Group LLC, employment law is our exclusive focus. That concentration provides a deep understanding of the employment disputes that frequently proceed to arbitration, including discrimination claims, retaliation allegations, wage disputes, restrictive covenant matters, executive employment agreements, severance disagreements, and workplace tort claims.
Whether serving as a sole arbitrator or a member of a multi-arbitrator panel, we bring the subject-matter knowledge, professional judgment, and case-management skills necessary to conduct a fair and efficient proceeding.
What Are the Advantages of Maryland Employment Arbitration?
Many employers and employees choose arbitration because it offers a private forum where an experienced neutral can focus on the issues in dispute without the formalities that often accompany traditional litigation.
Parties frequently view arbitration as an attractive option because it may provide:
- Greater efficiency—a more streamlined process that often resolves sooner than court litigation;
- Experienced decision-makers—the opportunity to select a neutral with substantial employment-law knowledge and familiarity with workplace disputes;
- Scheduling flexibility—hearing dates and case deadlines that can often accommodate the needs of the parties, witnesses, and counsel;
- Enhanced privacy—a forum that generally offers greater confidentiality than proceedings conducted in open court; and
- Finality—a process that typically provides limited grounds for appeal, allowing disputes to conclude without years of additional litigation.
As a member of the American Arbitration Association’s Employment Arbitration Panel, firm founder and Maryland employment arbitrator Joyce E. Smithey combines that firm-wide employment law experience with extensive arbitration expertise and a balanced understanding of the concerns that both employers and employees bring to workplace disputes.
Whether you need a sole arbitrator or a member of a multi-arbitrator panel, Smithey Law Group offers the experience and impartial approach many parties seek when selecting a neutral to oversee an employment arbitration.
What Types of Workplace Disputes Can a Maryland Employment Arbitrator Resolve?
Employment arbitration covers a broad range of workplace conflicts. Some involve a single legal issue. Others include multiple claims, competing factual narratives, and significant financial or professional consequences for the individuals and organizations involved.
Common Virginia employment arbitrations involve:
- Discrimination disputes—claims involving race, sex, age, disability, religion, pregnancy, national origin, or other protected characteristics;
- Retaliation allegations—matters arising after an employee reports discrimination, workplace misconduct, wage violations, safety concerns, or other protected activity;
- Wage and hour disagreements—conflicts involving overtime compensation, employee classification, commissions, bonuses, payroll practices, or unpaid wages;
- Employment contract disputes—issues involving executive agreements, compensation arrangements, incentive plans, separation provisions, or contract interpretation;
- Restrictive covenant matters—disputes concerning noncompete agreements, nonsolicitation provisions, confidential information, trade secrets, or post-employment obligations;
- Severance-related conflicts—disagreements involving severance benefits, release agreements, continuing obligations, or alleged breaches of separation terms; and
- Workplace tort claims—employment-related allegations involving defamation, fraud, interference with business relationships, or similar claims.
Many of these disputes involve overlapping legal issues and competing interests. Smithey Law Group’s exclusive concentration on labor and employment law provides the firm with a practical understanding of the workplace dynamics, legal principles, and business considerations that often shape employment arbitrations while maintaining a neutral perspective toward both employers and employees.
Can a Maryland AAA Arbitrator Serve as a Sole Arbitrator or a Member of a Panel?
Depending on the parties’ agreement, the applicable arbitration rules, and the complexity of the dispute, an employment arbitration may proceed before a single Maryland AAA arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators.
Parties may choose a sole arbitrator when they want:
- A streamlined process—one decision-maker overseeing the proceeding from beginning to end;
- Efficient scheduling—fewer logistical challenges when coordinating conferences, hearings, and deadlines; and
- Reduced costs—one neutral rather than a multi-member panel.
In other situations, parties may prefer a panel because the dispute involves:
- Significant financial exposure—claims with substantial economic consequences;
- Complex legal issues—multiple claims, extensive evidence, or novel questions of law; or
- High-stakes employment matters—disputes involving executives, restrictive covenants, compensation arrangements, or other issues with long-term business implications.
As an American Arbitration Association member, Joyce E. Smithey can serve as either a sole arbitrator or a member of a multi-arbitrator panel.
That versatility allows Smithey Law Group to assist with a wide range of employment arbitrations, from streamlined individual disputes to complex matters involving multiple claims, significant evidence, or substantial business interests.
Why Does Maryland Employment Law Experience Matter in Arbitration?
Arbitration may take place outside a courtroom, but employment disputes still require the arbitrator to evaluate the laws, agreements, and factual issues that govern the parties’ rights and obligations. As a result, subject-matter knowledge often plays an important role in the arbitration process.
When selecting a Maryland AAA arbitrator for an employment dispute, attorneys and parties value experience with:
- Maryland workplace laws—state-specific statutes and legal principles that may affect employment-related claims and defenses;
- Federal employment regulations—the laws that frequently govern discrimination, retaliation, wage and hour disputes, and other workplace matters;
- Employment agreements—contracts involving compensation, severance, confidentiality obligations, restrictive covenants, and executive employment terms;
- Workplace investigations—the factual records and personnel issues that often form the foundation of employment disputes; and
- Complex employment claims—matters involving multiple legal theories, competing evidence, and significant professional or financial consequences.
Employment arbitration often requires more than an understanding of procedure. It requires the ability to evaluate workplace disputes within their legal and practical context.
Through its exclusive focus on labor and employment law, Smithey Law Group has developed substantial experience with the issues that commonly arise in Maryland employment disputes, providing valuable insight while maintaining the neutrality expected of an arbitrator.
What Should You Look for in a Maryland Employment Arbitrator?
Selecting an arbitrator often involves more than finding someone familiar with arbitration procedures. The person overseeing the proceeding may make decisions affecting discovery, scheduling, evidentiary issues, witness testimony, and ultimately the outcome of the dispute. For that reason, parties frequently evaluate both legal experience and professional judgment when selecting a neutral.
Parties often look for:
- AAA panel membership—selection to the American Arbitration Association’s Employment Arbitration Panel and familiarity with AAA rules and procedures;
- Employment-law concentration—substantial experience handling workplace disputes rather than a broad, general litigation practice;
- Balanced perspective—experience working with both employers and employees to provide insight into the legal, practical, and strategic concerns each side often brings into an employment arbitration;
- Case-management skills—the ability to maintain schedules, address procedural issues efficiently, and keep the proceeding moving forward; and
- Professional credibility—leadership roles, publications, teaching experience, and recognition within the employment-law community.
Those considerations are particularly important in employment disputes, where legal issues often intersect with workplace relationships, business operations, and professional reputations.
While credentials and experience matter, many parties also ultimately seek something less tangible: confidence in the arbitrator’s judgment. Through decades of leadership in Maryland’s legal community, extensive contributions to Maryland employment law scholarship, and regular involvement in professional education, Smithey Law Group has earned the trust of attorneys throughout the state.
Looking for an Employment Arbitrator Maryland Attorneys and Parties Trust?
By the time an employment dispute reaches arbitration, the parties often face more than a legal disagreement. A business may be defending decisions that affect its operations and reputation.
An employee may engage in conduct that affects a career, compensation, or professional future. Attorneys, HR professionals, and in-house counsel frequently find themselves navigating complicated facts, competing narratives, and significant financial interests.
In those situations, the choice of arbitrator matters.
Smithey Law Group has built a reputation within Maryland’s employment-law community through leadership, scholarship, and professional service. Our attorneys serve on the Maryland State Bar Association’s Labor and Employment Section Council and Board of Governors, teach employment law courses and seminars, publish extensively on workplace and litigation issues, and regularly speak at employment law conferences across the country.
Joyce E. Smithey authored the Fourth Edition of Maryland Rules Commentary, contributed to the Maryland Employment Law Deskbook, and serves on the American Arbitration Association’s Employment Arbitration Panel. And our work and insight have also been featured by national media outlets, including MSNBC, The New York Times, The Washington Post, U.S. News & World Report, and others.
That background provides something many parties value in a neutral arbitrator—perspective. Because Smithey Law Group’s attorneys have worked with both employers and employees throughout their careers, they understand the concerns, objectives, and challenges that commonly arise on each side of a workplace dispute.
It’s the kind of insight that helps inform the arbitration process while preserving the impartiality essential to a neutral decision-maker. Whether serving as a sole arbitrator or a member of a multi-arbitrator panel, Smithey Law Group brings the professionalism, preparation, and thoughtful decision-making necessary to help employers, employees, and their counsel resolve workplace disputes fairly and efficiently.
If you need an experienced employment arbitrator for a Maryland workplace dispute, contact Smithey Law Group today.
Official Legal and Other Sources Used to Inform This Page
To ensure the accuracy and clarity of this page, we referenced official legal and other sources during the content development process.