A lawsuit often begins with a disagreement. An arbitration usually begins with a decision: selecting a trusted neutral party.
When Virginia employers, executives, professionals, and attorneys need a neutral decision-maker for a workplace dispute, they often seek someone with substantial employment law knowledge, sound judgment, and the ability to manage a proceeding efficiently from beginning to end.
A Virginia employment arbitrator fills that role by overseeing the arbitration process, resolving procedural issues, evaluating evidence, and issuing a final award.
At Smithey Law Group LLC, employment law is not one practice area among many. It is the firm’s exclusive focus.
That concentration gives us a deep understanding of the workplace disputes that frequently proceed to arbitration, including discrimination claims, retaliation allegations, wage-and-hour disputes, executive employment agreements, restrictive covenant matters, severance disputes, and workplace tort claims.
Whether the dispute involves an employee asserting workplace claims, an employer defending its business decisions, or attorneys seeking a respected neutral to resolve a complex employment matter, Smithey Law Group offers the legal knowledge, case-management skills, and balanced perspective necessary to conduct a fair, efficient, and professional arbitration.
Our attorneys regularly teach, write, and speak on employment-law issues, serve in leadership positions within the legal profession, and have earned recognition from organizations such as Chambers, Best Lawyers, Lawdragon, Super Lawyers, and Martindale-Hubbell.
That depth of experience helps us understand the legal, strategic, and practical concerns that parties often bring into employment arbitration while maintaining the neutrality essential to the process.
What Makes Arbitration a Practical Alternative to Courtroom Litigation?
Employment arbitration allows parties to resolve workplace disputes outside the court system. Instead of presenting their case to a judge or jury, the parties submit evidence and legal arguments to a neutral arbitrator who manages the proceeding and issues a final decision.
Many employers and employees choose arbitration because it provides a more efficient and flexible path to resolution than traditional litigation.
While every dispute presents unique challenges, arbitration often offers parties greater control over the process while preserving the opportunity to fully present their claims and defenses.
Parties frequently select arbitration for several reasons, including:
- Efficiency. Arbitration often reaches a hearing more quickly than court litigation because the parties and arbitrator can establish schedules tailored to the needs of the case.
- Privacy. Court filings generally become public records. Arbitration proceedings typically remain confidential.
- Employment law experience. The parties often have the opportunity to select a neutral with substantial knowledge of workplace laws, employment agreements, and common employment-related claims.
- Procedural flexibility. Arbitration often allows the parties to create practical discovery plans and hearing procedures that fit the complexity of the dispute.
- Finality. Abitration awards generally face limited opportunities for appeal, which can reduce the likelihood of years of additional litigation.
A well-managed arbitration does not simply move faster than litigation. It also creates a forum where the parties can focus on the merits of the dispute rather than spending months navigating crowded court dockets and procedural delays.
For many employers, employees, executives, and attorneys, that combination of efficiency, flexibility, and informed decision-making makes arbitration an attractive alternative to courtroom litigation.
What Types of Employment Disputes Can a Virginia Employment Arbitrator at Smithey Law Group Arbitrate?
As a member of the American Arbitration Association’s employment panel, Joyce Smithey has experience with the types of workplace conflicts that commonly proceed to arbitration.
Through Smithey Law Group’s exclusive focus on labor and employment law, the firm has worked with employment issues arising from a wide range of workplace relationships and legal claims, giving us a balanced understanding of the concerns that employers, employees, executives, and their attorneys often bring into an arbitration proceeding.
At Smithey Law, we’ve presided over disputes involving:
- Discrimination claims—allegations involving race, sex, age, disability, religion, pregnancy, national origin, or another protected characteristic;
- Harassment allegations—claims involving workplace conduct, hostile work environment issues, employer responses, or disputed accounts of particular events;
- Retaliation disputes—claims arising after an employee reports discrimination, harassment, wage violations, safety concerns, or other protected activity;
- Wage and hour matters—disputes involving overtime pay, employee classification, commissions, bonuses, compensation practices, or unpaid wages;
- Executive employment agreements—conflicts involving compensation packages, equity interests, incentive plans, separation provisions, or contract interpretation;
- Noncompete and nonsolicitation disputes—matters involving restrictive covenants, client relationships, confidential information, trade secrets, or post-employment obligations;
- Severance disagreements—disputes concerning severance benefits, release agreements, continuing obligations, or alleged breaches of separation terms; and
- Workplace tort claims—employment-related claims involving defamation, fraud, interference with business relationships, or similar allegations.
Many employment arbitrations involve more than one claim, more than one legal theory, and more than one perspective. At Smithey Law Group, our exclusive focus on labor and employment law ensures a deep understanding of the complex workplace issues that frequently arise in these disputes, allowing us to provide a fair, informed, and efficient forum for resolution.
How Does the Employment Arbitration Process Work?
Employment arbitration follows a structured process designed to move a dispute from filing to resolution. Although every case differs, most proceedings follow a similar path.
A typical employment arbitration may include:
- AAA administration—case administration through the American Arbitration Association and arbitrator selection under applicable AAA rules;
- Preliminary conference—an initial meeting to identify issues, discuss procedures, and establish expectations for the case;
- Scheduling orders—deadlines governing discovery, motions, witness disclosures, hearing dates, and other case milestones;
- Discovery—the exchange of documents, information, and other evidence relevant to the dispute;
- Motions and procedural rulings—decisions addressing evidentiary issues, discovery disputes, scheduling conflicts, and other procedural matters;
- Evidentiary hearing—presentation of testimony, documents, and legal arguments before the arbitrator;
- Post-hearing submissions—written briefs or proposed findings submitted after the hearing when appropriate; and
- Final award—a written decision resolving the issues presented in the arbitration.
While the process often resembles a private trial, arbitration frequently offers greater flexibility than traditional litigation. The arbitrator plays an important role in helping the parties move efficiently through each stage while ensuring a fair opportunity to present their positions.
As a member of the American Arbitration Association and seasoned employment lawyer, Joyce Smithey brings the experience and subject-matter knowledge necessary to manage employment arbitrations from the initial conference through the issuance of a final award.
What Does a Virginia AAA Arbitrator Do?
A Virginia AAA arbitrator serves as a neutral decision-maker in employment disputes administered through the American Arbitration Association (AAA).
Rather than advocating for either side, the arbitrator oversees the proceeding, resolves procedural issues, evaluates evidence, and ultimately issues a written award based on the facts and applicable law.
A Virginia AAA arbitrator may be responsible for:
- Managing the initial conference—establishing schedules, setting deadlines, identifying key issues, and creating a framework for moving the case forward;
- Establishing realistic deadlines—creating schedules and establishing deadlines that move the case forward while allowing the parties sufficient time to prepare;
- Resolving procedural disputes promptly—addressing disagreements concerning discovery, motion practice, witness disclosures, scheduling conflicts, and evidentiary issues;
- Maintaining clear expectations—communicating procedures, deadlines, and hearing requirements throughout the arbitration;
- Keeping the focus on relevant issues—preventing unnecessary disputes from consuming time and resources;
- Conducting hearings—presiding over testimony, reviewing documentary evidence, hearing legal arguments, and maintaining an orderly proceeding;
- Evaluating legal and factual issues—analyzing the evidence, credibility of witnesses, contractual provisions, and applicable employment laws;
- Issuing rulings throughout the case—making decisions on procedural matters that arise before and during the hearing; and
- Preparing the final award—issuing a written decision that resolves the dispute and explains the outcome when appropriate.
Perhaps most importantly, a Virginia AAA arbitrator must remain impartial. The arbitrator’s role is not to advance the interests of an employee or employer. Instead, the goal is to provide a fair forum, apply the law to the facts presented, and decide the dispute on its merits.
What Qualities Should You Look for in an Employment Arbitrator in Virginia?
Selecting an arbitrator involves more than reviewing a résumé. Attorneys, employers, and employees often look for someone who understands employment law, manages proceedings efficiently, and approaches each dispute with an even-handed perspective.
When evaluating an employment arbitrator in Virginia, employment attorneys and parties may consider factors such as:
- AAA panel membership—service on the American Arbitration Association’s employment panel and familiarity with AAA rules and procedures;
- Experience—substantial experience handling workplace disputes involving discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wage and hour issues, restrictive covenants, severance agreements, and executive employment matters;
- General and state-specific employment law knowledge—familiarity with federal and Virginia employment statutes, common-law claims, restrictive covenant requirements, wage-payment laws, and other legal principles that may affect the outcome of an arbitration;
- Balanced perspective—an understanding of the legal and practical concerns that both employers and employees bring to workplace disputes;
- Case-management ability—the skill to establish clear expectations, resolve procedural disputes, maintain schedules, and move cases efficiently toward resolution; and
- Professional reputation—recognition from peers, publications, speaking engagements, leadership positions, and contributions to the development of employment law.
Those qualities help explain why attorneys and parties often look beyond arbitration experience alone when selecting a neutral. Through its exclusive focus on labor and employment law and Joyce Smithey’s service with the AAA, Smithey Law Group brings the deep knowledge and professional judgment necessary to navigate those challenges effectively.
Frequently Asked Questions
How Is an Arbitrator Different from a Mediator?
A mediator helps the parties negotiate a voluntary resolution, while an arbitrator hears evidence, decides disputed issues, and issues a binding award.
Do Employers and Employees Use the Same Arbitrator?
Yes. A neutral arbitrator serves both parties equally and decides the dispute based on the evidence, applicable law, and the terms of any governing agreements. The arbitrator’s role differs from that of an advocate and requires impartiality throughout the proceeding.
Can Attorneys Participate in Selecting the Arbitrator?
In many cases, yes. Depending on the arbitration agreement and applicable rules, the parties often have an opportunity to review potential arbitrators and participate in the selection process before the arbitration begins.
What Happens If the Parties Disagree During the Arbitration Process?
The arbitrator resolves procedural disputes involving scheduling, discovery, evidence, and other issues that arise during the proceeding so the case can continue moving toward resolution.
How Long Does an Employment Arbitration Take?
No two cases follow the same timeline. Factors such as claim complexity, the amount of discovery required, the number of witnesses, and the parties’ schedules can all affect how quickly a matter reaches resolution.
Is Employment Arbitration Confidential?
Arbitration generally offers greater privacy than courtroom litigation because court filings and hearings often become part of the public record. However, the level of confidentiality depends on the applicable rules, agreements, and circumstances of the case.
Why Does Employment Law Experience Matter When Selecting an Arbitrator?
Employment disputes frequently involve workplace policies, personnel decisions, contractual obligations, and evolving legal standards. An arbitrator with substantial employment law experience may better understand the practical and legal issues that shape the parties’ positions.
Speak to an Experienced Virginia Employment Arbitrator Today
When attorneys and parties select an arbitrator, they are doing more than choosing someone to preside over a hearing. They are choosing the person who will manage the process, resolve procedural disputes, evaluate the evidence, and ultimately decide the case.
Smithey Law Group offers qualities that attorneys and parties often seek in an employment arbitrator, including:
- Exclusive employment-law focus—experience with the discrimination claims, retaliation disputes, wage issues, executive agreements, restrictive covenant matters, and workplace conflicts that frequently appear in employment arbitrations;
- Respected professional leadership—service on the Maryland State Bar Association’s Labor and Employment Section Council and Board of Governors, along with regular speaking engagements at employment-law conferences and seminars;
- Recognized thought leadership—extensive publications on employment law and civil litigation, including Suzanne E. Smithey’s authorship of the Fourth Edition of Maryland Rules Commentary and contributions to the Maryland Employment Law Deskbook;
- Nationally recognized credentials—honors from organizations including Chambers, Best Lawyers, Lawdragon, Super Lawyers, Martindale-Hubbell, and other respected legal organizations; and
- AAA panel experience—service on the American Arbitration Association’s employment panel and familiarity with the management of complex employment arbitrations.
Together, those experiences provide the employment-law knowledge, case-management skills, and balanced perspective that employers, employees, executives, and attorneys often seek when selecting a neutral.
If you are looking for a Virginia employment arbitrator to oversee a workplace dispute fairly, efficiently, and professionally, contact Smithey Law Group today.
Official Legal and Other Sources Used to Inform This Page
To ensure the accuracy and clarity of this page, we referenced official legal and other sources during the content development process.